Checklists in Law Practice
Monday, February 1, 2010 at 10:36AM

I just finished reading a really interesting book about... checklists. Yeah, I know that reading a book about checklists sounds about scintillating as watching paint dry. I was skeptical, too, at first. The book is The Checklist Manifesto by Dr. Atul Gawande, a writer and surgeon at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.
I was able to purchase and read it on my Kindle, but it appears that you can't do that any more, presumably because of the insane death match between Amazon and Macmillan publishing.
In any event, the central message of the book is that checklists prove enormously helpful when used in complicated undertakings. The author recounts stories of checklists used by pilots, surgeons, restaurants, venture capital investors and high-rise construction and engineering companies. The stories are fascinating, but I wouldn't recommend reading the accounts of air disasters while you are on a plane. That was not a good call on my part at all.
Checklists, according to Gawande, function best if they are short and comprised of quickly performed tasks. Their function is not to convey novel substantive information but rather to serve as a prompt for some of the little things that, if unperformed, could have disastrous results. Gawande references the law as a profession with many complicated projects, and thus ripe for the use of checklists; he does not, however, have any stories about law firms using checklists.
I had a run-in with checklists some years back in my own legal career.
A number of years ago I was busy practicing law in a boutique law firm and my senior partner (who was an avocational pilot) and I came to loggerheads over using checklists. He saw how useful they proved in flying planes and wanted to put them to use in the law firm, particularly for our newer associates. Training and managing our new associates was my job, and I balked at the use of checklists. Our work was too specialized and too individualized to be reduced to a checklist, I contended.
The fact was, I hated the idea and so I continued to push back until it finally went away. Looking back, I see that what I hated about the idea of using checklists was that it felt demeaning, as if practicing law was just a few steps down the continuum from flipping burgers. I argued that our associates would feel demeaned, but really, I was the one with the emotional reaction to the idea.
In reading The Checklist Manifesto, I learned that a lot of professionals have that reaction to checklists, at least at first. Once you have had your bacon saved by checklist, apparently, you immediately grasp their value.
In retrospect, both on the book and my argument against the use of checklists in my law practice, I was wrong. Not only is there nothing demeaning about using a checklist to keep from making dumb mistakes, but the extra protection using checklists can afford to a lawyer's clients and reputation only serves to enhance one's credibility.
The Checklist Manifesto is not meant to be a how-to manual, but rather a conceptual take on the value of checklists. To serve blogging penance for my earlier anti-checklist sins (I am a lapsed Catholic, after all), I'll share a few pragmatic tidbits I took from the book:
- Pause point: you must define a clear pause point at which the checklist is supposed to be used. Think, right before you file a complaint or execute an agreement.
- Read-Do vs Do-Confirm: decide if you want the checklist to serve as a guide before a process is undertaken (read-do) or as a safety net before the process if finalized (do-confirm)?
- Length: keep the checklist between 5 and 9 items and make sure it fits on one page. Longer is not better.
- Easy to Read: keep it free of clutter and jargon and use upper and lowercase text in a sans serif font.
Maybe that's enough to whet your appetite for learning a bit more about how you might use checklists in your law practice. If not, here are a couple of short takes on Gawande's book by a couple of guys with some pretty good ideas of their own: Steven Levitt (author of Freakonomics) and Macolm Gladwell (author of The Tipping Point, Outliers and some other thought provoking stuff).
Check it out.
I apparently should use a checklist for blog posts to help avoid using bad puns.
Erik Mazzone | |
Email Article
Management 

Reader Comments (8)
I love checklists. I had an old boss who always wanted to use them and we railed against them as insulting. But when I started my own practice I put checklists into place for everything from accepting a new client (Matt Homann's Client Worthiness Index) to setting up files to paying myself from my IOLTA account (a 10 step checklist.)
I also use checklists when reviewing client's existing estate plan documents. Not only does it help me make sure I don't miss anything, but I think it also shows my reasoning to the client if I'm recommending changes.
I respect checklists. I find it's best to write a short checklist of what you want to accomplish the next day at the end of each day. The next morning, you'll get caught up in one seems important at the time and often forget the tasks that you really need to accomplish by the end of the day. Checklists allow you to slow things down an analyze your day's tasks, and at the end of the day feel accomplished about what you've completed.
I often use a more complicated form of checklist, in which I separate my day's tasks into four categories, Urgent and Essential, Urgent but Not Essential, Not Urgent but Essential, and Not Urgent or Essential. In my experience, it's much more important to complete the most Essential tasks, not necessarily the most Urgent ones (which always seem more important at the time).
Hey Leanna, that's very cool. I hadn't read Mat's Client Worthiness Index, so I am off to Google around looking for it. I was about to say that estate planning would seem like a practice with many opportunities to use checklists, but the more I think about it, the more I think every law practice has lots of stuff that would be perfect for checklists. Thanks for taking the time to stop by and leave a comment!
Hey Julie, those are great ideas. I like your four quadrant approach to task management -- somewhat reminiscent of Stephen Covey's approach in 7 Habits.
One of the topics that Gawande hits on in his book is that all "learned occupations" (his phrase, not mine) have a definition of professionalism that includes: 1) selflessness (placing clients concerns above our own), 2) skill (we aim for excellence) and 3) trust-worthiness (we won't abscond with the church funds). He adds that pilots have a 4th part of the definition: discipline.
As a human who is sorely lacking in discipline in some areas in my life, this one struck me right between the eyes. I bring this up because your 4 quadrant approach is a great way to use a checklist to build in discipline: focusing on the most important things even when something else is screaming for your attention.
Thanks for stopping by and leaving the comment!
Erik:
Great post - this sounds like a book to put on my list. I've always been a fan of checklists, but then I'm a list maker anyway.When you run your own show like Leanna does (or I do) these checklists can come in enormously handy - particularly if you're interrupted frequently, because they can help you find your place faster. I need checklists for all kinds of things (some of which I have and some of which I don't have, but should). For example, every time I want to add a new product or service to my website, I wish I had a good checklist for all of the steps I have to go through, from creating the sales page and links on the site, to adding it to the shopping cart, to creating the autoresponder messages, thank-you page, etc.
Checklists are great for training, too - it takes some of the anxiety out of training new people (even if those people are doing work on an outsourced or virtual basis, rather than as direct employees) because you both know that there will be a checklist to fall back on. It's tough to remember all of the little things that go into the tasks that you're used to doing on a daily basis, and it's even more difficult to absorb when you're trying to learn something new.
Glad you've been converted to checklists!
Thanks for stopping by and leaving the comment, Allison. My conversion to checklists has, thus far, been largely theoretical. I am looking forward to developing some and integrating them into my workflow, though!
Chcklists are great, but putting one together from scratch is a lot of work. I much perfer using someone's and adapting it to my needs.
I think one key for use in law is to differentiate between checklists and lists of best practices--very different, but both of great value to lawyers. I'm working to build a master list of both litigation checklists and lists of best practices for use in Colorado courts at http://www.jeffvail.net/2010/05/litigation-checklist.html
My hope is to build an open-source knowledge management system for litigation--is anyone else working on something similar?